It can be configured with enough processing power, ram, and internal storage to edit entire projects completely on its own without any additional drives or eGPUs attached.There is a massive difference in the size of the 13″ MBP and the 16″ MBP. BIZON V5000 14-Core 4K/6K/8K Video Editing Workstation Computer 2020The 16″ MacBook Pro was the first laptop that I would consider a useable editing machine for a professional post production environment. When installed, your Mac Pro can handle up to 6 streams of 8K ProRes RAW or 23 streams of 4K ProRes RAW.Max Yuryev put the 13″ MBP and the 16″ MBP through a series of real-world tests to see how they hold up against each other.To compare the iMac Pro and Mac Pro to our BIZON V5000 4K/6K/8K video editing workstation, we tested the following system configurations, using Premier Pro version 13.1: 1. It is a specially designed accelerator card that can encode videos using Apple’s ProRes and ProRes RAW codecs. But does the 2020 13″ MacBook Pro have the muscle it takes to drive this editing revolution, or will it be cut down by its (slightly) older brother, the 2019 16″ MacBook Pro?This allows an exemption to proxy workflows, so you can directly start work on the 8K or 4K files extracted from the camera. Chassis designed for Mac and Windows professionals and gamers.Now laptops have the connectivity, speed, and capacity to handle full projects without additional peripherals, freeing the pasty editor from their sheltered servitude and shining a ray of hope into their otherwise secluded lives.For this test, Max timed the 13″ and the 16″ using the same 20 second clip in Final Cut Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Adobe Premiere Pro.As you can see, the 16″ MBP is nearly 3x faster at stabilizing the 20 second clip in every application except Premiere Pro – which is unbelievably slow at stabilizing footage compared to the other programs. AMD Radeon Pro 5300M with 4GB of GDDR6 memoryStabilizing footage in post is something video editors have to do everyday, and it requires a lot of processing power. 2.6GHz 6-core 9th-generation Intel Core i7 processor 2.0GHz quad-core 10th-generation Intel Core i5 processor
![]() Best 4K Video Card Pro Series Of RealThe 16″ MBP is operating without any issues with a number of LUTs placed on it in FCPx, Resolve, and Premiere. 2 – 5 Minute ProjectWorking in a 5 minute 4k Project on both the 13 and 16 MBPs, Max’s test show that the 13″ MBP starts to lag with just 2 LUTs placed on it in FCPx. A lot of that has to do with the 16″ MBP’s AMD graphics card compared to the Intel Iris Plus Graphics card that is integrated into the motherboard of the 13″ MBP.The AMD graphics card on the 16″ is doing a lot of the processing in FCPx and Resolve, and I am assuming the warp stabilizer in Premiere is CPU based only. Apple motion 5 mac torrent4 – Blackmagic RawAccording to the Blackmagic RAW Speed Testing app, the 13″ MBP should be able to handle BRAW with easy, but for whatever-reason, this tiny laptop can only manage to playback the footage at 3fps while the 16″ MBP had no issues playing the footage back at full speed.Upon export, the same clip that took the 13″ over 60 minutes was processed by the 16″ MBP in about 4 minutes. However, exporting the footage is a whole other story.Exporting C200 RAW footage in FCPx with the 13″ MBP took 4x as long as it took the 16″ MBP. For whatever reason, FCPx seems to handle C200 RAW footage the best and in this test the 13″ MBP did reasonably well playing C200 footage without much lag. 3 – C200 Raw FootageThe Canon C200 offers fantastic image quality in RAW, but it’s well known that the compressed nature of this codec is rather intensive on any editing system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorScott ArchivesCategories |